Training organizations work hard to set their communities up for success so they can take full advantage of the economic opportunities presented by green initiatives. Staff want to make sure their students can connect to jobs—but most important, to jobs that will enable them to stay in their communities and thrive.
The training content and design drivers that we have discussed may be similar across the programs we included in our interviews, but those insights become further nuanced when you layer on specific regional dynamics.
The following sections consider some of those regional nuances using classifications from JFF’s Nationwide Risk and Readiness Tool, which categorizes regions as either Critical, Exposed, Early, or Primed based on how susceptible they are to negative impacts of climate change, their level of social vulnerability—which we assessed based on factors such as access to affordable housing and rates of poverty, food insecurity, and unemployment, and how well prepared they are, in terms of their political landscape and local labor market, to invest in and grow green industries and a green workforce.1
Note: While these designations are helpful in identifying patterns and best practices, they are not the way that these organizations or regions self-identify. By including these examples, we hope to encourage organizations working in similar conditions by sharing best practices and common struggles.
Critical
Critical regions are relatively well prepared to take action but face severe risks in terms of climate patterns and social vulnerability. Communities in these regions may be eager to take significant action to bolster economic and environmental resilience through the continued emergence of green jobs and development of green infrastructure.

Training Practitioners’ Perspectives
We need to be in constant dialogue with employers. Our mission isn’t just to train people; it is to make sure employers want to hire them… not just posting a job and hoping for the best.
We want everyone to see that there is a place for them in the green economy because all jobs are going to be climate jobs at some point in some way or impacted in some way by climate.
We are always looking at ways to build wealth locally and reverse this trend of extraction, which is how we grew up—work leaving our communities.
-
General Profile
High risk, high readiness
- Climate patterns suggest that extreme weather events, such as long droughts, hurricanes, or wildfires, are common.
- Social vulnerability indicators may suggest a higher incidence of social challenges such as poverty, a lack of affordable housing, food insecurity, and unemployment, making it critical to create more quality green jobs.
- Local labor market trends suggest that industries have green job openings and require green skills.
- The political landscape is likely supportive and open to legislation and policy changes to foster climate change mitigation, economic resilience, and the emerging green economy.
-
In Action
Nine organizations are in states with ratings of Critical. They have been in operation for an average of 32 years. Their training programs average six months in length but range from eight-week courses to multiyear apprenticeship programs.
- Programs in Critical Regions: BT BOCES (Binghamton, New York); Clackamas Community College (Portland, Oregon); Colorado Mountain College (Glenwood Springs, Colorado); The Industrial Commons (Morganton, North Carolina); Louisiana Green Corps (New Orleans, Louisiana); Oregon Clean Energy Workforce Coalition / Coffee Creek Correctional Facility (Portland, Oregon); Partner4Work (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania); Recycle Force (Indianapolis, Indiana); Rising Sun (Oakland, California)
- Industries They Focus On: Construction, manufacturing, recycling and reclamation, renewable energy, textiles
- Populations They Serve: local residents, youth, people with less than a four-year degree, people with criminal records, members of populations currently underrepresented in the focus industries
-
Reflection Questions
If our organization is in a county with a Critical rating, what might this mean for us?
- Are there existing programs we could partner with? How can we collaborate with them?
- What local, state, or regional government funding is available? Who is accessing it, and how can we partner with them?
- How might we repurpose existing resources? (Equipment or training facilities, for example.)
- How can our work remain in sync and aligned with what is happening locally but also be sustained independently?
Exposed
Exposed regions face severe risks and might be unprepared to take action. Communities in these regions may rely on nonprofit organizations or institutions of higher learning to share insights about how to best increase readiness in the face of high risk. There’s an urgent need for leaders to work collaboratively to promote environmental and economic resilience. The two organizations in these regions address that need through relationship-building efforts to strengthen dialogue and promote trust.

Training Practitioners’ Perspectives
There is this general distrust of people coming in saying, ‘I have this new technology and you are going to love it.’ I don't ever advocate us doing that because I want whatever it is that we do to be built within the community first... because if we are going to be giving them these resources, I want them to have the ability to use it, to capitalize off it, and to be enriched by it instead of being dependent on somebody else.
Look for somebody who is already doing the work and join them.
-
General Profile
High risk, low readiness
- Climate patterns suggest that extreme weather events, such as long droughts, hurricanes, or wildfires, are common.
- Social vulnerability indicators may suggest a higher incidence of social challenges such as poverty, a lack of affordable housing, food insecurity, and unemployment.
- Local labor market trends suggest low instances of industries providing green job openings and requiring green skills.
- The political landscape is likely unsupportive of legislation and policy changes to foster climate change mitigation, economic resilience, and the emerging green economy.
-
In Action
Two organizations are in counties with ratings of Exposed. One has been in operation for nine years; the other for 137 years. Their training programs range from one-week courses to multiyear apprenticeships.
- Programs in Exposed Regions: Green Careers Texas (Dallas, Texas); Utah State University College of Agriculture and Applied Science (Logan, Utah)
- Industries and Occupations They Focus On: Electricians, energy, manufacturing, outdoor product design and development
- Populations They Serve: local residents, youth, people with less than a four-year degree
-
Reflection Questions
If our organization is in a county with an Exposed rating, what might this mean for us?
- Are there changes that we could make to existing processes to be responsive to our community? Who should be involved in identifying potential changes?
- How might we need to change our messaging to make our work more palatable to local stakeholders? (For example, which of these terms would work best in our community: “advanced energy” or “clean energy”?) How might we increase buy-in?
Early
Early regions do not currently face severe risks, but the combination of a lack of green jobs and green skills and an unsupportive political landscape suggests the need to build the foundations, infrastructure, and partnerships to respond to potential future risks. The training practitioners we interviewed at organizations in Early regions said it is important to broaden the community’s understanding of what the term “green jobs” means and raise awareness of the impact these jobs can have on the local economy.

Training Practitioners’ Perspectives
Things are moving, but not fast enough or in the most effective direction. Every state needs a workforce facilitator focused on emerging technologies to connect fragmented efforts and build a contiguous path from awareness to careers—because every state is different.
Rather than create new training programs specific to clean energy, it makes more sense to integrate with existing training for similar skill sets. This approach helps demonstrate that workforce development efforts can be multifaceted; we can concurrently train for multiple occupations in thoughtful, efficient ways that keep both the learner and the industry in mind.
-
General Profile
Low risk, low readiness
- Climate patterns suggest that extreme weather events, such as long droughts, hurricanes, or wildfires, are not common.
- Social vulnerability indicators may suggest a lower incidence of social challenges such as poverty, a lack of affordable housing, food insecurity and unemployment, making it critical to expand quality green jobs.
- Local labor market trends suggest low instances of industries providing green job openings and requiring green skills.
- The political landscape is likely unsupportive of legislation and policy changes to foster climate change mitigation, economic resilience, and the emerging green economy.
-
In Action
Three of the organizations are in counties with ratings of Early. They have been in operation for an average of 24 years. Their training timelines vary. The Tennessee College of Applied Technology offers a 16-month program with HVAC and advanced manufacturing training. The other two offer apprenticeships, including Registered Apprenticeship and pre-apprenticeship programs; the length of these experiences varies by industry.
- Programs in Early Regions: The Arkansas Advanced Energy Foundation (Little Rock, Arkansas); the Youth Workforce Development Foundation (Pekin, Illinois); the Tennessee College of Applied Technology (TCAT) Jacksboro (Jacksboro, Tennessee)
- Industries They Focus On: Advanced manufacturing, construction, energy, HVAC
- Populations They Serve: Local residents, youth, people with less than a four-year degree
-
Reflection Questions
If our organization is in a county with an Early rating, what might this mean for us?
- Are there nonprofits or institutions of higher education that might be willing to collaborate with us to establish a training curriculum that leads to quality jobs?
- How can we share information with one another to ensure that no organization is starting from scratch? How can we sustain these processes?
Primed
Primed regions face less risk than others but are nevertheless relatively well prepared to take action. Communities in these regions may not have as much need to navigate the extreme weather impacts or the deep social vulnerability challenges of a changing climate, but they have made significant progress in expanding access to green jobs and have strong political support to continue building an emerging green economy.

Training Practitioners’ Perspectives
Being part of sector partnerships allows our senior level staff to connect with other leaders in those fields, while our case managers and program managers can build relationships at the hiring manager level. This is important because the hiring managers can aid in pulling forward candidates applications and work with the SJI frontline staff to ensure current skill needs are called out in the candidates’ resumes.
Electrified vehicles... really, there’s three sectors to that: There’s the people that build electronic vehicles, there’s the people that service them, and the people that charge them. But nobody had curriculum for that, so our job was to try to find where those curriculums existed and either acquire them or find funding to develop them further to get them scaled out into community colleges.
-
General Profile
Low risk, high readiness
- Climate patterns suggest that extreme weather events, such as long droughts, hurricanes, or wildfires, are not common.
- Social vulnerability indicators may suggest a lower incidence of social challenges such as poverty, a lack of affordable housing, food insecurity, and unemployment
- Local labor market trends suggest industries have green job openings and require green skills.
- The political landscape is likely supportive and open to legislation and policy changes to foster climate change mitigation, economic resilience, and the emerging green economy.
-
In Action
Two organizations are in counties with ratings of Primed. They have been in operation for an average of 13 years. Their training programs range from six weeks to six months in length.
- Programs in Primed Regions: Michigan Workforce Training and Education Collaborative (Dearborn, Michigan); Seattle Jobs Initiative (Seattle, Washington)
- Industries, Occupations, and Specialties They Focus On: Energy (retrofit installer technicians, battery technicians), resilience (eco-friendly stormwater infrastructure)
- Populations They Serve: local residents, people with less than a four-year degree
-
Reflection Questions
If our organization is in a county with a Primed rating, what might this mean for us?
- Are there ways to bring together existing work? What might we contribute?
- How can we determine who are the best representatives from different types of stakeholders? (For example, at an employer partner would it be a hiring manager or a vice president?)
- How can we position our training programs as career exploration opportunities?
Endnotes
- For more on the data indicators used in this analysis see Our Approach to developing the National Risk and Readiness Tool.